marketing-claims-review

Review marketing copy for claims requiring substantiation, rewording, or removal.

Updated Jun 17, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tk1cntt/PhapChe --skill marketing-claims-review-tk1cntt
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: marketing-claims-review
Source: https://github.com/tk1cntt/PhapChe/tree/main/docs/claude-for-legal-main/product-legal/skills/marketing-claims-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tk1cntt/PhapChe --skill marketing-claims-review-tk1cntt

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Marketing copy often contains factual, comparative, implied, or absolute claims that create legal exposure with regulators or competitors. This Skill extracts every claim from pasted copy, classifies it, checks substantiation, and suggests compliant rewrites. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Claim Extraction and Classification: Identifies every claim in landing pages, emails, ads, and taglines, then classifies each as puffery, specific factual, comparative, implied, or absolute. - Substantiation and Standards Check: Researches applicable FTC, NAD, state UDAP, sector, and platform rules, tags citations by source confidence tier, and flags claims lacking substantiation. - Actionable Output: Produces a claim-by-claim review with calls (fine, needs substantiation, needs rewording, cut), revised copy for short assets, and a substantiation request table. - Use Case: Paste a landing page claiming "50% faster than Competitor X" and "100% accurate" to receive a per-claim risk call, suggested rewordings, and a list of data needed before the copy ships. ## Quick Start Paste your marketing copy and ask the assistant to review these claims for substantiation and legal risk before publication.

Frequently Asked Questions about marketing-claims-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review marketing copy for legal risk before publishing?

Paste the copy into the skill, which extracts every claim, classifies it by type, checks substantiation, and assigns a call: fine, needs substantiation, needs rewording, or cut. It outputs suggested rewrites and a list of data needed before the copy ships.

What types of advertising claims does this review flag?

It flags specific factual claims like performance percentages, comparative claims naming competitors, implied claims a reasonable reader would infer, and absolute claims like "never" or "100%". Pure puffery and vague subjective statements are noted but generally not actionable.

Does the review cover FTC and NAD advertising standards?

Yes, it researches applicable FTC rules, NAD decisions, state UDAP statutes, sector regulations, and platform policies for the specific claims under review. Citations are tagged by source tier, and unverified model-knowledge citations are flagged for attorney verification.

Can non-lawyers approve marketing claims with this review?

No. When the configured user role is non-lawyer, the skill blocks a "Ready to ship: Yes" verdict until the user confirms attorney review, and it generates a one-page brief to bring to counsel. Review calls like "with changes" do not require this gate.

What are the limitations of automated marketing claims review?

It reviews words only, not design or imagery, though it flags images implying claims. It does not write original marketing copy, does not substantiate claims itself, and cannot verify current legal standards without a research tool or attorney confirmation.