Score architecture payloads across M, D, R, and C dimensions for B2B exit.
npx skills add https://github.com/gapfDev/workflow --skill me-2b
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: me-2b Source: https://github.com/gapfDev/workflow/tree/main/c1.5/.claude/skills/me-2b Command: npx skills add https://github.com/gapfDev/workflow --skill me-2b
This skill automates objective B2B exit scoring for architecture payloads, providing consistent evaluation before handoff.
Provide a B2B exit evaluation for an architecture payload by scoring M, D, R, and C and applying the HB Validation Gate.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Score architecture readiness by evaluating M (Mapping), D (Dependency), R (Risk), and C (Coherence) dimensions, then applying the formula (M + D + R + C) / 4 to produce a verifiable exit score.
B2B exit scoring is an automated evaluation process that validates file mappings, build sequences, risk mitigations, and data-flow coherence before an approved architecture design transitions to B3.
Check dependency risks by mapping approved designs, validating build order, verifying risk mitigations, and tracing data-flow coherence through the HB Validation Gate prior to handoff.
Yes, objective scoring validates build sequences by applying calibration anchors and traceability checks across data flows, ensuring approved designs are correctly mapped before passing to B3.
You need architecture handoff validation when finalizing an architecture payload, ensuring file mappings, build order, risk mitigations, and data-flow coherence are verified before transitioning downstream.
Architecture payload scoring requires traceability checks to verify that file mappings, build sequences, and data flows are coherently traced and risk-mitigated before passing the HB Validation Gate.
ShaheerKhawajaGenerate structured architecture reviews with data flows, error paths, and test matrices.
C0ntr0lledCha0sScore Claude responses across accuracy, completeness, clarity, efficiency, security, and usability.
coleschafferAudit ad, email, landing page, and VSL copy against the RMBC framework.
HaykTarkhanyanEvaluate scholarly work with dimension-based scoring and weighted quality assessments.
