Multi-Agent Voting

Implement multi-agent voting with MAKER-style error correction for consensus decisions.

Updated Jan 5, 2026

Search Tags:#code review #consensus building #decision-making #error correction #multi-agent voting

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/Marcus-Mok-GH/Claude-code-conductor --skill multi-agent-voting-marcus-mok-gh

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: Multi-Agent Voting
Source: https://github.com/Marcus-Mok-GH/Claude-code-conductor/tree/main/.claude/skills/multi-agent-voting
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Marcus-Mok-GH/Claude-code-conductor --skill multi-agent-voting-marcus-mok-gh

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires .spec-flow/config/voting.yaml, .spec-flow/config/red-flags.yaml, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps users make critical decisions with confidence by enabling multi-agent voting, reducing the risk of errors, and fostering consensus.

Core Features & Use Cases

Multi-Agent Voting: Facilitates voting on critical decisions with error correction, improving the accuracy of outcomes.
Consensus Building: Useful for code reviews, breaking changes, and spec validations where multiple inputs are needed.
Error Correction: Based on the MAKER algorithm, it provides robust error correction by using multiple agents' votes.
Use Case: When deciding on a major code change, use this Skill to gather input from multiple agents, reducing the likelihood of missing critical issues.

Quick Start

Run the voting engine for a code review operation with the context file 'code-review-context.md'.

Frequently Asked Questions about Multi-Agent Voting

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How does multi-agent voting improve code review and decision-making?▼

Multi-agent voting improves code review by gathering input from multiple agents to reach consensus, reducing the risk of missing critical issues during high-stakes decision-making.

What is the MAKER-style error correction mechanism for consensus building?▼

MAKER-style error correction uses a first-to-ahead-by-k mechanism, applying multiple agents' votes to provide robust error correction and ensure accurate outcomes for critical decisions.

How do I run a multi-agent voting operation for a code review?▼

To run a multi-agent voting operation, execute the voting engine with a designated context file like 'code-review-context.md' to facilitate consensus on major code changes.

Do I need specific configuration files to use multi-agent voting for spec validation?▼

Yes, multi-agent voting requires .spec-flow/config/voting.yaml for configuration and .spec-flow/config/red-flags.yaml for red flag definitions to validate specifications.

When should I use multi-agent voting for breaking changes?▼

Use multi-agent voting for breaking changes when multiple inputs are needed to foster consensus, ensuring robust error correction and reducing the likelihood of missing critical issues.

What are the limitations of using a first-to-ahead-by-k voting algorithm?▼

The first-to-ahead-by-k algorithm is limited to operations requiring consensus and high-stakes decision-making, relying on predefined red flags within configuration files to function correctly.