multi-mind

Orchestrate six-agent debates to critique PRDs and code decisions.

1|Updated Jan 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/elsolal/Skillz-Claude --skill multi-mind
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: multi-mind
Source: https://github.com/elsolal/Skillz-Claude/tree/main/.claude/skills/multi-mind
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/elsolal/Skillz-Claude --skill multi-mind

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill enables structured, multi-agent debates to challenge PRDs and code decisions, surfacing diverse perspectives and reducing blind spots before implementation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Six-Agent Debate Engine: Orchestrates six AI agents (Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, GLM, Kimi) to analyze PRDs and code reviews from multiple viewpoints.
  • Five-Round Process: Conducts Critique, Frictions, Targeted Debate, Convergence, and Consensus to produce a comprehensive assessment.
  • Automated Documentation: Generates a final Markdown report and saves it to docs/debates with a structured audit trail, including divergences.
  • Safe & Reproducible: Enforces rules to prevent premature consensus, logs all critiques, and documents trade-offs.

Quick Start

To run Multi-Mind on a target document, provide the file path and mode (prd or review). Example:

  • prd /path/to/PRD.md
  • review /path/to/Review.md

Frequently Asked Questions about multi-mind

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I use multi-agent debate for code review and PRD validation?

To use multi-agent debate for code review and PRD validation, provide your target file path and mode, such as `review /path/to/Review.md` or `prd /path/to/PRD.md`, to trigger the analysis. The system then automatically orchestrates a five-round critique process.

What is a multi-agent debate process for software architecture decisions?

A multi-agent debate process for software architecture decisions is an orchestrated workflow where six distinct AI agents analyze PRDs and code from multiple viewpoints. It surfaces diverse perspectives, documents divergences, and produces a final consensus report to reduce blind spots.

How does multi-agent consensus work to reduce blind spots in engineering workflows?

Multi-agent consensus works by enforcing a five-round process of Critique, Frictions, Targeted Debate, Convergence, and Consensus. This structured workflow prevents premature consensus, logs all critiques, and documents trade-offs to ensure robust decision-making and risk assessment.

Can I automate documentation and audit trails for PRD critiques?

Yes, you can automate documentation and audit trails for PRD critiques. The debate engine automatically generates a final Markdown report and saves it to the `docs/debates` directory, providing a structured audit trail that includes all divergences and trade-offs.

What are the limitations of using AI agents for targeted debate in code reviews?

A limitation of using AI agents for targeted debate in code reviews is the strict enforcement against premature consensus, which requires completing all five rounds. This ensures comprehensive risk assessment but may increase processing time before reaching a final consensus.