multi-pr-review

Automate pull request reviews with multiple AI agents and consensus prioritization.

Updated Apr 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/silva2kand/silva-ide --skill multi-pr-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: multi-pr-review
Source: https://github.com/silva2kand/silva-ide/tree/main/_cowork_os_pack/package/resources/skills/multi-pr-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/silva2kand/silva-ide --skill multi-pr-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill streamlines the process of reviewing pull requests by conducting multi-agent consensus evaluations, reducing manual effort and increasing review thoroughness.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-agent Review: Executes parallel code reviews with multiple independent agents to identify issues.
  • Consensus Aggregation: Combines reviewer findings to prioritize critical issues.
  • Use Case: A developer wants to automatically review a PR for security and correctness issues across large codebases, receiving a summarized report highlighting consensus problems for quick action.

Quick Start

Use the multi-pr-review skill to run an automated, multi-agent review of your pull request by specifying the PR number and repository details.

Frequently Asked Questions about multi-pr-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate pull request code reviews for large codebases?

Automate pull request code reviews by running multiple independent AI agents in parallel to identify, classify, and prioritize issues. This multi-agent approach analyzes large codebases to reduce manual effort and increase review thoroughness.

What is multi-agent consensus in code review automation?

Multi-agent consensus in code review automation executes parallel evaluations using independent AI agents, then aggregates their findings to prioritize critical code issues. This ensures thorough quality assurance by highlighting problems multiple reviewers identify.

How do I run an automated consensus-style PR review?

Run an automated consensus-style PR review by specifying the pull request number and repository details. The skill initiates parallel reviews with multiple agents, aggregates their findings, and generates a summarized report highlighting consensus problems.

Does automated multi-agent PR review work for security and correctness issues?

Automated multi-agent PR review works for security and correctness issues by deploying independent agents to evaluate code changes across large codebases. It identifies and classifies these issues based on severity and aggregated consensus.

Can I use this automated code review for quality assurance workflows?

You can use this automated code review for quality assurance workflows by integrating multi-agent consensus evaluations into your pipeline. It supports software teams by classifying and prioritizing identified pull request issues for quick action.

Why use a multi-agent approach for pull request reviews instead of a single reviewer?

Use a multi-agent approach for pull request reviews to achieve consensus-based issue identification. Unlike a single reviewer, parallel independent agents increase thoroughness, classify severity accurately, and reduce manual effort through aggregated summarized reports.