nature-polishing

Restructure academic manuscript prose into concise Nature-leaning English.

Updated May 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/lth0/codexSkill --skill nature-polishing-lth0
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: nature-polishing
Source: https://github.com/lth0/codexSkill/tree/main/skills/codex/nature-polishing
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/lth0/codexSkill --skill nature-polishing-lth0

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

It helps you polish, restructure, or translate academic manuscript prose into concise Nature-leaning English while preserving facts, citation intent, and scientific responsibility.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Paper-architecture guided rewriting: Reorders and rebuilds paragraphs using reader workflow and hourglass structure (broad → narrow → broad) rather than polishing sentences in the wrong rhetorical place.
  • Evidence/claim/boundary enforcement: Diagnoses failure modes like missing gap logic, claim-without-evidence, results-vs-discussion drift, and overclaiming; then repairs them.
  • Phrase-level language support: Applies phrase families and style guardrails derived from Academic Phrasebank for hedging, transitions, limitations, and consistent British journal mechanics.
  • Chinese-to-English publication polishing: Reconstructs explicit logic links (contrast, cause, implication, limitation) instead of translating mechanically.

Quick Start

Use nature-polishing to polish the abstract of your manuscript by asking: "Polish and restructure this abstract into concise Nature-leaning English, keep all claims defensible, and rewrite only to improve argument flow and readability."

Frequently Asked Questions about nature-polishing

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I polish an academic manuscript into Nature style English?

To polish an academic manuscript into Nature style English, the skill restructures paragraphs using an hourglass logic and applies phrasebank-style hedging to enforce claim-evidence boundaries, ensuring concise, journal-ready prose while preserving scientific meaning.

What is the best way to translate Chinese academic drafts into publication-quality scientific English?

Translating Chinese academic drafts into publication-quality scientific English requires reconstructing explicit logic links like contrast and implication rather than translating mechanically, ensuring the rhetorical structure matches Nature-leaning publication standards.

How do I fix overclaiming and missing gap logic in a scientific manuscript?

Fixing overclaiming and missing gap logic involves diagnosing failure modes like claim-without-evidence and results-vs-discussion drift, then repairing them with evidence-weighted phrasing and strict claim-evidence boundary controls to protect the core argument.

Can I use this to restructure my abstract's rhetorical structure without losing scientific meaning?

Yes, you can restructure an abstract's rhetorical structure without losing scientific meaning by rebuilding paragraphs using a reader workflow and broad-narrow-broad hourglass logic, preserving all facts and citation intent throughout the rewriting process.

Does this manuscript polishing approach avoid fabricating references and data?

Yes, this manuscript polishing approach avoids fabricating references and data by enforcing claim-evidence-boundary controls and author responsibility, ensuring all wording and evidence-weighted phrasing rely strictly on existing manuscript content without generating fake citations.