neel-nandaify-paper

Audit ML paper drafts against a verifiable checklist of writing best practices.

4|Updated Feb 25, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/AMindToThink/claude-code-settings --skill neel-nandaify-paper
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: neel-nandaify-paper
Source: https://github.com/AMindToThink/claude-code-settings/tree/main/skills/neel-nandaify-paper
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/AMindToThink/claude-code-settings --skill neel-nandaify-paper

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps researchers turn ML paper writing into a disciplined, verifiable review process so claims, evidence, and presentation quality can be checked against the current draft instead of remembered loosely.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Builds a living paper checklist based on Neel Nanda’s ML writing advice.
  • Ties every completed item to specific prose in the draft so reviews stay grounded in the current text.
  • Supports new-paper setup, revision passes, and pre-submission audits for research manuscripts.
  • Helps authors catch weak claims, missing evidence, unclear exposition, and reproducibility gaps before submission.

Quick Start

Copy the checklist template into your paper directory and then work through it item by item while anchoring each completed check to the exact sentence or label in the current draft.

Frequently Asked Questions about neel-nandaify-paper

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit an ML research draft for reproducibility and claim discipline?

You audit an ML research draft by applying a verifiable checklist that links each tick to specific prose in your current LaTeX document. This grounds writing best practices into a review process for catching weak claims and reproducibility gaps.

What is a paper audit checklist and how does it help with ML writing?

A paper audit checklist is a structured Markdown list based on Neel Nanda's ML writing advice. It helps researchers catch missing evidence, unclear exposition, and reproducibility gaps by anchoring every completed check to exact sentences in the current draft.

How do I set up a pre-submission review for a machine learning paper?

You set up a pre-submission review by copying a Markdown checklist template into your paper directory. You then work through it item by item, anchoring each completed check to the exact sentence or label in your current .tex draft.

Can I use this checklist approach for revising existing research papers?

Yes, you can use the checklist approach for revising existing research papers. The process supports revision passes by tying every completed item to specific prose in the draft so reviews stay grounded in the current text.

Do I need a specific file format to perform a verifiable paper audit?

Yes, you need a root SKILL.md with YAML frontmatter and a Markdown checklist. The checklist must link each tick to specific prose in your current .tex draft to ensure the review remains verifiable.

What's the best way to track evidence and claims in LaTeX drafts?

The best way to track evidence and claims in LaTeX drafts is using a living paper checklist that anchors each completed check to specific text. This prevents weak claims and missing evidence from being remembered loosely instead of verified.