nw-review

Dispatch an expert reviewer agent to critique workflow artifacts and embed review metadata.

Updated Mar 18, 2024
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/v1bh0r/precise-ledger-pro --skill nw-review-v1bh0r
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: nw-review
Source: https://github.com/v1bh0r/precise-ledger-pro/tree/main/nWave/skills/nw-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/v1bh0r/precise-ledger-pro --skill nw-review-v1bh0r

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Dispatches an expert reviewer agent to critique workflow artifacts. Use when roadmaps, implementations, or steps need quality review before proceeding.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Applies Radical Candor to deliver nuanced, actionable feedback.
  • Reviews artifacts such as roadmaps, implementations, or steps, and updates the original artifact with embedded review metadata.
  • Enforces structured feedback formats (praise, issue, suggestion, etc.) and supports verification of review criteria.

Quick Start

Invoke /nw-review with the base agent, artifact-type, and artifact-path to run a review.

Frequently Asked Questions about nw-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run an automated quality review on my project roadmap or implementation steps?

To run an automated quality review, invoke the review command with the base agent, artifact-type, and artifact-path. The system dispatches an expert reviewer agent to critique your roadmap, implementations, or steps before proceeding.

What is the best way to apply radical candor to generate structured feedback on workflow artifacts?

Applying radical candor to workflow artifacts involves dispatching an expert reviewer agent that enforces structured feedback formats like praise, issue, and suggestion. This delivers nuanced, actionable critique directly into your project artifacts.

Can I embed review metadata directly into existing implementation artifacts?

Yes, you can embed review metadata directly into existing implementation artifacts. The review process validates artifact paths and outputs updated artifacts with embedded review metadata, ensuring feedback is stored contextually.

Does the quality assurance process support verifying specific steps within a larger implementation workflow?

Yes, the quality assurance process supports verifying specific steps within a larger implementation workflow. By providing a step_id along with the artifact-type and artifact-path, you can target individual steps for critique.

What are the limitations of using automated artifact critique for quality assurance?

A key limitation is that automated artifact critique requires valid artifact paths for processing. Without correctly specified artifact paths or step_id parameters, the reviewer agent cannot validate or update the target workflow files.

How do I validate artifact paths before running a quality assurance review on my workflow steps?

To validate artifact paths before a quality assurance review, invoke the review command with the correct base agent, artifact-type, and artifact-path. The system inherently validates these paths during the critique process to ensure accurate feedback.