nw-review

To get automated feedback on implementation plans, you can dispatch an expert reviewer agent to critique the artifact before proceeding. The agent formats feedback using Radical Candor, Conventional Comments, and severity statuses to ensure a clear approval workflow.

The best way to review workflow artifacts for quality assurance is to dispatch an expert reviewer agent that critiques roadmaps, implementation plans, and execution steps. It applies rigor profile integration and returns structured feedback with approval statuses before you proceed.

To run a rigorous project lifecycle review, dispatch the reviewer agent against your execution steps. The agent derives feedback using optional dimensions and step_id handling, returning critique formatted with Conventional Comments and severity levels for each artifact.

No specific dependencies are required to critique roadmaps before handoff. The reviewer agent operates independently to validate inputs, apply rigor profiles, and generate structured approval statuses for your workflow artifacts without external component requirements.

Yes, you can use Conventional Comments to format artifact critique and approval statuses. The reviewer agent frames feedback using Radical Candor with structured formatting, providing clear severity levels and approval statuses for each workflow artifact.

Workflow artifact reviews fail input validation when the submitted artifact does not meet the agent's required input formats or rigor profile dimensions. Ensure your roadmap or implementation plan includes valid step_id handling and optional dimensions before dispatching the reviewer.