oh-story-review

Reviews web novel outlines and chapters against canon with severity-graded findings.

677|112|Updated Mar 3, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/LiPu-jpg/Openwrite_skill --skill oh-story-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: oh-story-review
Source: https://github.com/LiPu-jpg/Openwrite_skill/tree/main/tools/runtime_skills/oh-story-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/LiPu-jpg/Openwrite_skill --skill oh-story-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Long-form fiction drafts accumulate continuity errors, broken causality, and pacing issues that are hard to catch manually. This Skill performs evidence-based commercial review of web novel outlines, chapters, or finished short pieces, grading every problem by severity so authors know what to fix first.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Four-Tier Severity Grading: Classifies findings as blocking, severe, general, or polish, covering facts, causality, character agency, reader contract, pacing, information, and expression.
  • Evidence-Backed Findings: Each issue includes location or quote, reader impact, supporting evidence, and a minimal fix direction; insufficient evidence is flagged as needing more material.
  • Prioritized Revision Plan: Outputs top-priority problems, strengths worth keeping, a suggested revision order, and open questions requiring author judgment.
  • Use Case: Before submitting a chapter, ask for a review against your confirmed canon and outline; receive a structured report listing continuity conflicts and pacing issues ranked by severity, without any unwanted rewriting of your text.

Quick Start

Use the oh-story-review skill to review my current chapter against the confirmed canon and give me an evidence-based, severity-graded revision list.

Frequently Asked Questions about oh-story-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a novel chapter for continuity errors?

Run the review against your confirmed canon and prior chapters. The skill checks facts like names, timelines, locations, injuries, abilities, and world rules against the source of truth, then reports each conflict with evidence and severity.

What does a severity-graded manuscript review include?

Findings are graded into four tiers: blocking (canon violations, missing causality), severe (character agency loss, unresolved conflict), general (pacing, repetitive dialogue), and polish (wording and punctuation). Each item lists location, evidence, reader impact, and minimal fix.

Does the review rewrite my chapter automatically?

No. By default it only outputs a diagnostic report and never modifies the manuscript. Candidate rewrites are produced only when you explicitly request them, and formal text submission still goes through the OpenWrite workflow.

Can it review outlines as well as finished chapters?

Yes. The skill accepts outlines, individual chapters, or complete short works as review targets. You specify the scope, target readers, and whether you want diagnosis only or diagnosis plus revision suggestions.

What are the limitations of automated fiction review?

The review treats confirmed canon and committed text as the factual baseline and cannot judge authorial intent beyond it. Items with insufficient evidence are marked as needing more material, and trade-off decisions are left for the author to decide.