oiticica-confused-words

To fix confused word pairs during proofreading, the Skill validates the sentence relation and context, then applies a Pass/Fail rubric to confirm the correct word choice and provide a one-sentence contrast explanation.

Checking for swapped near-synonym words involves diagnosing mismatches among pairs like imply/infer by examining the sentence's actual relation and action, then repairing the choice with an objective rubric check.

Semantic contrast review works by detecting mismatches in commonly swapped pairs, verifying the chosen word fits the sentence relation, and producing a concrete contrast explanation to ensure correct future word choice.

Yes, rubric-based review applies to peer review and rewriting tasks by enforcing a Principle/Preserve or Weak/Fault/Better workflow to verify the confused pair is named, the word fits context, and register stays consistent.

Yes, word choice revision explains the correction by generating a one-sentence contrast explanation that clarifies the semantic difference between the swapped pair, enabling transferable learning for future writing.

Automated confused words detection focuses strictly on near-synonym and near-homophone pairs causing ambiguity or misinterpretation, requiring objective rubric checks rather than addressing broad stylistic or grammatical rewriting.