Review Open Mercato code for architectural, security, and quality issues.
npx skills add https://github.com/SHGrowth/om-superpowers --skill om-code-review
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: om-code-review Source: https://github.com/SHGrowth/om-superpowers/tree/main/skills/om-code-review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/SHGrowth/om-superpowers --skill om-code-review
Code reviewers spend time ensuring OM code adheres to architecture, security, naming conventions, and quality standards. This skill provides structured review guidance and concrete findings to improve PRs.
Review the latest PR diff to verify architecture, security, naming conventions, and quality against OM standards.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
You can audit code for architecture and security gaps by running an automated review against PR diffs and commits. This process enforces CI/CD gates, validates template parity, and outputs categorized findings with actionable fixes to attach to your pull request.
The best way to enforce module structure and naming conventions during code reviews is to use an automated audit skill. It checks proper module layout, validates coding standards across frontend and backend boundaries, and flags anti-patterns before merging.
Automated CI/CD code review handles test coverage by validating unit and integration tests within the submitted diff. It checks patches across modules and services to ensure tests meet OM quality standards before merging the PR.
Yes, you can use automated code review for diffs and patches across frontend and backend boundaries. The review process identifies architectural deviations and validates that data handling and security checks meet standards across all service modules.
You generate a categorized findings checklist for code quality anti-patterns by running an automated audit on your commit or patch. The review outputs structured findings categorized by severity—Critical, High, Medium, or Low—each accompanied by actionable fixes.
00PrabalK00Review diffs and patches for code quality, architecture, and risk.
FaysilAlshareefReview .NET pull requests using severity-based checklists for architecture, security, performance, testing, and style issues.
adiytharpansaGenerate and validate unit, integration, and end-to-end test suites.
Nhqvu2005Review code for security, naming, and performance issues using regex patterns.
