ovid-receive-code-review

To enforce a code review workflow with item-by-item commits, handle feedback individually and commit each fix only after tests pass. This ensures traceable, incremental progress and guards against semantic changes using contract-analysis checks.

Contract-analysis during code review verifies that fixes do not introduce semantic changes. It acts as a guardrail alongside red/green/refactor cycles, ensuring each committed change maintains existing behavioral contracts before moving to the next feedback item.

The best way to handle pasted code review comments is processing them item-by-item within an interactive session. Apply required pre-conditions, fix the issue, run tests, and commit the change before analyzing and moving to the next pasted comment.

Yes, you can apply red/green/refactor TDD cycles when receiving code review feedback. This approach layers on top of existing review processes, requiring tests to pass before continuing to the next issue and ensuring auditable, repeatable progress.

Yes, you need to invoke a base receiving-code-review process first. After establishing that foundation, you apply four additional rules item-by-item, fixing issues and committing after each test pass to guarantee traceable changes.

Committing after each code review fix instead of batching changes ensures traceable, incremental progress. This disciplined workflow requires tests to pass before continuing, making each change auditable and preventing semantic regressions via contract-analysis.