owner-gate-review

Generates HTML review forms that bind reviewer verdicts to individual design decisions.

2|Updated Jul 18, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Arasz/ai-badger --skill owner-gate-review-arasz
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: owner-gate-review
Source: https://github.com/Arasz/ai-badger/tree/main/features/common/skills/owner-gate-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Arasz/ai-badger --skill owner-gate-review-arasz

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Prose feedback on design documents loses the mapping between answers and the decisions they address, and hand-edited markdown answer slots silently drop multi-line notes. This Skill generates a per-decision review form so every verdict and note comes back structurally attached to the decision it belongs to. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Decision-card form generation: Builds a self-contained HTML form from references/form-template.html with one card per decision, each carrying a claim, detail, rationale, verdict control (approve/change/reject/defer), and a notes box. - Structured markdown output: The form emits a result file matching references/result-template.md, with stable decision IDs as join keys, blockquoted multi-line notes, and an explicit ## Not answered section so silence is never mistaken for consent. - Local file or Artifact variants: Runs as a file:// page with a watched result file on disk, or as a published artifact where the reviewer pastes feedback back into chat. - Use Case: You paste a 20-decision design doc for review. Instead of a wall of prose, the reviewer clicks verdicts card by card, and you ingest a markdown file where every ruling is bound to its decision ID. ## Quick Start Generate an owner-gate review form for the decisions in my design document and watch for the reviewer's feedback file.

Frequently Asked Questions about owner-gate-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I collect structured feedback on a design document?

Generate a review form from the provided HTML template with one card per decision, each having a verdict control and notes box. The reviewer saves feedback as structured markdown where every answer is bound to its decision ID.

How do I get reviewer answers back from a local HTML form?

Run a capped background watch loop on the expected output path, then read the result file when it appears. Verify the trailing end-of-feedback marker before ingesting, since a missing marker means the file was read mid-write.

Does the review form work in Firefox or Safari?

The File System Access picker is Chromium-only, so Firefox and WebKit fall back to a browser download, then clipboard, then a visible textarea. The form's status line always reports which save mechanism was used and where the file went.

Why does the review form need a unique storage key?

All file:// pages share one localStorage origin, so a generic key would load answers from a different review into this form. Use a unique key per review and tell returning reviewers to press Clear first.

What happens if a reviewer leaves a decision unanswered?

Unanswered items appear under an explicit Not answered section in the result file and must be treated as open, never as agreement. Reconcile each one by asking again or recording it as still open.