paper-review-panel

An academic review panel assesses conference paper acceptance risk by synthesizing multiple expert perspectives on contribution, methodology, and presentation. This skill integrates inputs from three reviewers into a single comprehensive assessment tailored to top-tier conference standards.

Yes, you can use this for internal paper reviews. The skill adapts its expert-level review standards for both top-tier conferences like CVPR, NeurIPS, and AAAI, and internal organizational evaluations, providing actionable feedback and acceptance likelihood insights.

Solo review mode generates a single expert evaluation, while panel review mode utilizes detailed roles for subagents to provide three distinct reviewer perspectives. These perspectives are then synthesized into one concise, actionable review with acceptance risk assessment.

To generate an expert paper review for risk assessment, run the skill with a specific research paper. It evaluates the paper's contribution, methodology, and presentation, synthesizing insights from three reviewer perspectives into a comprehensive report within minutes.

The academic review evaluates methodology and contribution alongside presentation quality. It focuses on the technical validity of the research methods and the significance of the paper's contribution to the field, matching the rigorous standards expected by top-tier venues.