paper-review-theoretical-depth

Identify implicit premises and theoretical coordinates in research manuscripts.

1|Updated Mar 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/alonegg/skills --skill paper-review-theoretical-depth
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: paper-review-theoretical-depth
Source: https://github.com/alonegg/skills/tree/main/paper-review/sub-skills/theoretical-depth
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/alonegg/skills --skill paper-review-theoretical-depth

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

The theoretical-depth review rule helps reviewers identify implicit premises and determine theoretical coordinates, enabling multi-framework reanalysis and ensuring insights are translated into actionable revision suggestions rather than abstract critique.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Identifies implicit premises across six dimensions to sharpen argument structure.
  • Locates and evaluates theory coordinates within main and neighboring frameworks to broaden analysis.
  • Guides the translation of insights into concrete, executable edits that strengthen the manuscript.

Quick Start

Apply this rule to a manuscript to surface 2-3 critical implicit premises and place the analysis within the three-layer theory framework.

Frequently Asked Questions about paper-review-theoretical-depth

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I identify implicit premises in an academic research manuscript?

To identify implicit premises in a research manuscript, apply a six-dimension analysis framework to surface foundational assumptions and sharpen the argument structure. This process exposes 2-3 critical premises to clarify underlying theoretical foundations.

What is the three-layer theory framework for manuscript review?

The three-layer theory framework is a structural model used to locate and evaluate theoretical coordinates within a manuscript. It positions the research within main and neighboring frameworks to broaden the analytical scope and critique the argument effectively.

How do I translate abstract theoretical critique into actionable revision suggestions?

Translate abstract critique into actionable revision suggestions by producing specific at-spot edits justified within discipline standards. This method ensures insights become concrete, executable edits that directly strengthen the manuscript.

Can I apply multi-framework review to evaluate theory coordinates in my research?

Yes, you can apply multi-framework review to locate and evaluate theory coordinates within your research. This approach places analysis within main and neighboring frameworks, broadening the critique to ensure comprehensive theoretical coverage.

How to use theoretical depth review for academic paper revision?

Use theoretical depth review for academic paper revision by applying Phase 1 and Phase 2 scenarios to critique arguments and surface implicit premises. This generates specific at-spot edits aligned with discipline standards to strengthen the manuscript.