paper-self-review

Review academic paper drafts for structure, logic, citations, figures, and clarity.

203|27|Updated Apr 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill paper-self-review-franklee16
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: paper-self-review
Source: https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills/tree/main/peer-review/paper-self-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill paper-self-review-franklee16

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

paper-self-review helps researchers identify missing sections, weak logic, incomplete citations, unclear figures/tables, and writing clarity problems before submission so the manuscript meets academic standards.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structure review: Verifies Abstract, Introduction, Method, Results, and Discussion completeness against common academic expectations.
  • Logic consistency check: Confirms research questions, methodology, interpretations, and conclusions align with the evidence presented.
  • Citation completeness: Checks that in-text citations are represented in the references, that formatting is consistent, and that key related work is included.
  • Figure/table quality: Ensures figures/tables have titles/captions and that they support the narrative with readability and format suitability.
  • Writing clarity: Reviews language concision, terminology usage, sentence clarity, and paragraph organization.
  • Use cases: Pre-submission QA, post-draft self-check, verification after revision, and preparation before advisor or collaborator review.

Quick Start

Use paper-self-review when you have a draft ready and want a systematic self-check for structure, logic, citations, figures/tables, and clarity across the whole manuscript.

Frequently Asked Questions about paper-self-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review an academic paper draft before submission?

To review an academic paper draft before submission, perform a comprehensive quality assurance check covering structure completeness, logic consistency, citation completeness, figure/table quality, and writing clarity.

What is a paper self-review checklist for academic writing?

A paper self-review checklist for academic writing is a structured auditing process that verifies manuscript sections, logical coherence, citation formatting, figure captions, and paragraph organization to meet academic standards.

How do I check academic paper citations and references for consistency?

Checking academic paper citations involves verifying that all in-text citations are represented in the reference list, ensuring formatting consistency, and confirming that key related work is properly included.

Can I verify research logic consistency after revising a manuscript?

Yes, you can verify research logic consistency after a revision by confirming that your research questions, methodology, interpretations, and conclusions still align with the presented evidence.

How do I audit figures and tables for a manuscript submission?

Auditing figures and tables for a manuscript submission requires ensuring they have proper titles and captions, support the narrative, and maintain readability with suitable formatting.

What is the best way to prepare a paper for advisor review?

The best way to prepare a paper for advisor review is to run a post-draft self-check that systematically identifies missing sections, weak logic, and writing clarity gaps across the entire manuscript.