paper-self-review

Review academic papers for structure, logic, citations, claims, figures, tables, and writing clarity.

Updated Jun 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/SunS1eep1ng/codex-dotfiles --skill paper-self-review-suns1eep1ng
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: paper-self-review
Source: https://github.com/SunS1eep1ng/codex-dotfiles/tree/main/skills/paper-self-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/SunS1eep1ng/codex-dotfiles --skill paper-self-review-suns1eep1ng

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a comprehensive checklist for researchers to self-review their academic papers before submission, ensuring high-quality and complete content.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structure Review: Checks the completeness and academic standard conformance of paper sections.
  • Logic Consistency Check: Verifies the logical coherence of the paper's content.
  • Citation Completeness: Ensures the completeness and accuracy of citations.
  • Research Claim Audit: Evaluates the paper's claims against available evidence.
  • Figure/Table Quality: Assesses the quality and effectiveness of figures and tables.
  • Writing Clarity: Reviews the clarity and readability of the paper's language.
  • Use Case: Before submitting a paper to a journal or conference, use this Skill to conduct a thorough self-review.

Quick Start

Run the paper-self-review skill to review the structure, logic, citations, and claims of your paper.

Frequently Asked Questions about paper-self-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct a systematic self-review of an academic paper before submission?

To conduct a systematic self-review of an academic paper, use a checklist-based approach to verify structure completeness, logic consistency, citation accuracy, claim validity, figure quality, and writing clarity before journal submission.

What should I check for when reviewing research claims and citations in my paper?

When reviewing research claims and citations, you should verify citation completeness and accuracy, and evaluate whether your paper's claims are fully supported by available evidence to ensure academic quality.

Can I use a checklist-based approach to check academic paper structure and writing clarity?

Yes, you can use a checklist-based approach to check academic paper structure for standard conformance, assess figure and table quality, and review language readability to ensure writing clarity.

What is the best way to verify the logical consistency of a research paper?

The best way to verify logical consistency in a research paper is to apply a systematic review checklist that checks the logical coherence of the content alongside structure and research claims.

Does this paper self-review tool require any specific formatting environments or dependencies?

No specific formatting environments or dependencies are required. The paper self-review tool operates independently to provide a comprehensive checklist for researchers to evaluate paper quality prior to submission.