paper-traceable-coauthor

To write a manuscript draft from source code and results, the skill generates traceable text for methods, experimental setups, and figure captions by bounding claims directly to repository evidence. It flags gaps where author confirmation is needed.

To ensure consistency between code and paper descriptions, the skill checks variable naming, units, and figure numbers against repository evidence. It aligns the narrative with source files and flags mismatches for review.

Yes, you can generate figure captions automatically from result files. The skill drafts figure descriptions directly from repository evidence and bounds the claims to the actual data outputs.

The best way to trace paper claims back to source evidence is to use an evidence-bounding approach that links every key statement to source code or results. This skill enforces evidence-based writing by bounding claims and flagging gaps.

To write an experimental setup section from repository files, the skill analyzes source code and results to generate a draft. It ensures the narrative accuracy of the experimental methods by bounding claims to the available evidence.

When there is missing evidence for a manuscript claim, the skill flags the specific evidence gap for author confirmation. This ensures the draft remains accurate and traceable to existing repository sources.