pbl-student

To define the student role for material-grounded PBL discussions, apply a participation contract that enforces hard rules like speaking as a student and grounding responses in provided materials. This ensures consistent role-based contributions across initial statements, free discussions, and teacher questions.

A material-grounded PBL workflow is an education-research cycle where student contributions are strictly anchored in provided reading materials and prior discussion history. It structures interactions through initial statements, free discussion, and teacher questions while updating a state_card to track progress.

To participate in PBL cycles, adopt the student persona and formulate responses by strictly referencing the provided material package and prior discussion history. This method satisfies the interaction flow requirements for initial statements and free discussions while maintaining material grounding.

Yes, this PBL student role definition works without external dependencies, as it operates entirely through internal reasoning and provided materials. It requires no additional components or frameworks to enforce the student persona, hard rules, and state_card updates during discussions.

The hard rules for student participation in PBL discussions require speaking strictly as a student, grounding all responses in the provided materials, and consistently updating the state_card. These rules ensure reflective answers and maintain the role-based workflow throughout the education-research cycle.

You need to update the state_card continuously during a PBL discussion cycle after contributing to initial statements, free discussions, or answering teacher questions. This tracking mechanism ensures the student role adheres to the material-grounded workflow and maintains accurate prior discussion history.