Evaluate manuscripts and grant proposals against reporting guidelines with structured feedback.
npx skills add https://github.com/ccam80/thesis-writer --skill peer-review-ccam80
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: peer-review Source: https://github.com/ccam80/thesis-writer/tree/main/skills/peer-review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ccam80/thesis-writer --skill peer-review-ccam80
This Skill provides a structured, end-to-end peer‑review toolkit to evaluate manuscripts and grant proposals with systematic rigor, helping editors and researchers deliver consistent, actionable feedback.
Use the peer-review skill to perform a complete evaluation by guiding through Stage 1 (Initial Assessment) to Stage 6 (Ethical Considerations) and generate a structured feedback report.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To perform structured peer review, evaluate the manuscript stage-by-stage across methodology, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, and reporting, then generate structured feedback with a summary and major or minor comments.
The peer review process supports established reporting guidelines including CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, ARRIVE, MIAME, and MINSEQE to ensure scientific rigor and standardized evaluations.
Yes, you can use this peer review process for grant proposals. It is designed to standardize and streamline scientific evaluation across disciplines for both manuscripts and grant applications.
The peer review evaluation guides you through six stages, starting with an Initial Assessment and concluding with Ethical Considerations, to produce a complete, publication-ready feedback report.
You generate a publication-ready feedback report by completing the stage-by-stage evaluation, which produces a summary statement, a reviewer checklist, and categorized major or minor comments aligned with reporting standards.
ovachieverAutomate systematic peer review of scientific manuscripts and grant proposals.
SciMate-AIEvaluate manuscripts with structured rubrics for methodology, statistics, and reporting standards.
Zeyuyang-0420Evaluate scientific study methodology, experimental design, and statistical analysis quality.
hxk622Evaluate scientific manuscripts and grant proposals for methodology, statistics, and ethics.
