skills.rest
hxk622
hxk622COMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

peer-review

Evaluate scientific manuscripts and grant proposals for methodology, statistics, and ethics.

8|Updated Jan 13, 2026
Search Tags:#scientific writing#grant review#peer review#research integrity#manuscript evaluation#reporting standards
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/hxk622/TokenDance --skill peer-review-hxk622
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: peer-review
Source: https://github.com/hxk622/TokenDance/tree/main/backend/app/skills/builtin/scientific/writing/peer-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/hxk622/TokenDance --skill peer-review-hxk622

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) and scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill streamlines the process of conducting thorough and constructive peer reviews for scientific manuscripts and grant proposals, ensuring high standards of quality and rigor.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured Evaluation: Provides a systematic workflow for assessing methodology, statistics, reporting standards, and ethical considerations.
  • Constructive Feedback: Guides users in generating detailed, actionable feedback for authors.
  • Use Case: A journal editor can use this Skill to guide a reviewer in evaluating a submitted manuscript, ensuring all critical aspects like statistical validity and adherence to reporting guidelines (e.g., CONSORT) are thoroughly checked.

Quick Start

Use the peer-review skill to evaluate the manuscript draft located at /path/to/manuscript.pdf.

Frequently Asked Questions about peer-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct a structured peer review of a scientific manuscript?▼

Conduct a structured peer review by systematically evaluating methodology, statistical validity, reporting standards, and ethical considerations section by section to generate constructive feedback.

Can I evaluate reporting standards like CONSORT and STROBE during manuscript evaluation?▼

Yes, manuscript evaluation supports adherence to established reporting guidelines like CONSORT and STROBE to ensure comprehensive checks for statistical validity and reporting standards.

How do I generate constructive feedback for grant proposals?▼

Generate constructive feedback for grant proposals by following a systematic workflow that assesses methodology, statistics, reporting standards, and ethical considerations to produce actionable author reports.

Does the peer review process support section-by-section assessment?▼

Yes, the peer review process supports detailed section-by-section assessment to evaluate methodology and statistical validity while generating comprehensive feedback reports for authors.

What is the best way to check statistical validity in scientific writing?▼

Check statistical validity in scientific writing by using a structured evaluation workflow that assesses methodology and reporting standards to ensure research integrity and rigorous review.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
aRustyDevaRustyDev

peer-review

Automates structured peer review of manuscripts and grant proposals across multiple standards.

Community
Advanced
JosephWoodallJosephWoodall
1

peer-review

Generate checklist-based peer reviews for manuscripts and grant proposals.

Community
Advanced
yf8578yf8578
1

peer-review

Assess scientific manuscripts and grant proposals using structured checklists.

Community
Advanced
loganylchenloganylchen

peer-review

Evaluate scientific manuscripts, grant proposals, and presentations against methodology and ethics checklists.

Community
Advanced