Verified:GitHub

peer-review

Assess scientific manuscripts and grant proposals using structured checklists.

1|Updated Mar 12, 2026

Search Tags:#scientific writing #grant review #peer review #research integrity #manuscript evaluation #reporting standards

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/yf8578/clawomics --skill peer-review-yf8578

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: peer-review
Source: https://github.com/yf8578/clawomics/tree/main/skills/peer-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/yf8578/clawomics --skill peer-review-yf8578

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill streamlines the complex and critical process of evaluating scientific manuscripts and grant proposals, ensuring thoroughness, rigor, and constructive feedback.

Core Features & Use Cases

Structured Evaluation: Guides reviewers through a systematic checklist covering methodology, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, and writing quality.
Reporting Standards Compliance: Helps assess adherence to discipline-specific guidelines (e.g., CONSORT, STROBE).
Use Case: A journal editor assigns a manuscript for review. The reviewer uses this Skill to systematically assess the paper's strengths and weaknesses, identify potential flaws, and generate a comprehensive, actionable review report for the editor and authors.

Quick Start

Use the peer-review skill to evaluate the attached manuscript draft 'research_paper_v3.pdf'.

Frequently Asked Questions about peer-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I conduct a structured peer review of a scientific manuscript?▼

To conduct a structured peer review, use a systematic checklist to evaluate manuscript methodology, statistical validity, reproducibility, and writing quality to generate actionable feedback.

Can I use a checklist to evaluate grant proposals for research integrity?▼

Yes, you can evaluate grant proposals using a checklist that assesses methodology, statistical validity, ethical considerations, and reporting standards to ensure research integrity.

What is the best way to assess statistical validity and reproducibility in a research paper?▼

The best way to assess statistical validity and reproducibility is systematically evaluating the methodology and data reporting against established scientific reporting standards.

Does this peer review process support generating actionable feedback for journal editors?▼

Yes, the peer review process supports generating detailed feedback by identifying manuscript strengths, weaknesses, and potential flaws to produce a comprehensive review report for editors and authors.