Structure cross-model proposal reviews with formal criteria and actionable recommendations.
npx skills add https://github.com/fancive/claude-skills --skill peer-review-fancive
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: peer-review Source: https://github.com/fancive/claude-skills/tree/main/skills/peer-review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/fancive/claude-skills --skill peer-review-fancive
Cross-model proposal reviews are time-consuming and prone to ambiguity; this Skill provides a structured, outbound-only critique workflow to challenge plans, architecture decisions, and viewpoints without exposing code diffs.
Provide a single concise proposal brief including the decision, context, options, recommendation, risks, and requested feedback.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Structured cross-model peer review for architecture decisions uses a guided workflow and formal criteria to produce actionable recommendations. You provide a proposal brief containing the decision, context, options, risks, and requested feedback for evaluation.
Cross-model critique is an outbound-only review process that challenges plans and viewpoints without exposing code diffs. You need it for proposal evaluation when reviews are time-consuming or prone to ambiguity and require documented rationale.
No, this workflow is not for code diffs. It is specifically designed to evaluate decisions, architecture choices, and plans, focusing on structured critique for proposals rather than source code changes.
To start a cross-model architecture review, provide a single concise proposal brief. This brief must include the decision, context, options, recommendation, risks, and requested feedback to initiate the guided critique workflow.
The best way to document rationale and risk signals for architecture choices is using a structured input contract. This gathers decision context and feedback to produce actionable recommendations and documented rationale.
andreaswasitaDraft a seven-section decision memo with context, options, and recommendation.
nksethCritique proposals through structured reasoning modes and synthesize risk mitigations.
SantiagoisperMeasure page load times, Core Web Vitals, and resource sizes with Lighthouse.
mqzkimReview code for architecture, security, performance, and concurrency issues.
