Verified:GitHub

peer-review

Evaluates manuscripts and grant proposals systematically for methodology, statistics, ethics, and writing quality.

Updated Mar 10, 2026

Search Tags:#scientific writing #grant review #peer review #research integrity #manuscript evaluation #reporting standards

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/felixboehm/biochem-allergy --skill peer-review-felixboehm

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: peer-review
Source: https://github.com/felixboehm/biochem-allergy/tree/main/.claude/skills/peer-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/felixboehm/biochem-allergy --skill peer-review-felixboehm

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill streamlines the complex and time-consuming process of conducting thorough, structured peer reviews for scientific manuscripts and grant proposals, ensuring all critical aspects are evaluated systematically.

Core Features & Use Cases

Comprehensive Evaluation: Assesses methodology, statistical validity, reporting standards, and ethical considerations.
Structured Feedback: Provides a systematic workflow for identifying strengths and weaknesses, generating actionable feedback.
Use Case: A journal editor can use this Skill to guide a reviewer through evaluating a submitted research paper, ensuring consistency and thoroughness in the review process.

Quick Start

Use the peer-review skill to evaluate the attached manuscript draft 'research_paper_v1.md'.

Frequently Asked Questions about peer-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I conduct a structured peer review of a scientific manuscript?▼

Conduct a structured peer review by systematically evaluating methodology, statistical rigor, reporting standards, and ethical considerations to generate actionable feedback. This skill provides a checklist and workflow to guide you through assessing scientific manuscripts comprehensively.

What is included in a comprehensive manuscript evaluation?▼

A comprehensive manuscript evaluation includes assessing methodology, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance, ethical considerations, and writing quality. It systematically identifies strengths and weaknesses to produce constructive, actionable feedback for the author.

Can I use this for grant proposal evaluation and reporting standards compliance?▼

Yes, you can use this for grant proposal evaluation and reporting standards compliance. The skill facilitates in-depth review of both grant proposals and scientific manuscripts, checking statistical rigor and reporting standards across various document types.

Does the peer review process support visual integrity checks for presentations?▼

Yes, the peer review process supports visual integrity checks for presentations via image conversion. This allows you to evaluate visual reporting standards and document compliance even when reviewing presentation formats.

What is the best way to evaluate research integrity and statistical rigor in a draft?▼

The best way to evaluate research integrity and statistical rigor is using a systematic workflow that checks methodology validity and ethical considerations. This ensures your review consistently addresses critical reporting standards and scientific writing quality.