peer-review

Evaluate manuscripts with checklist-driven peer review against reporting guidelines.

1|Updated Mar 4, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Hung-3008/agusta --skill peer-review-hung-3008
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: peer-review
Source: https://github.com/Hung-3008/agusta/tree/main/.agents/skills/peer-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Hung-3008/agusta --skill peer-review-hung-3008

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Peer-review is a structured evaluative process that codifies subjective judgments into repeatable, checklist-driven feedback, helping reviewers produce rigorous, consistent assessments with clear recommendations.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Checklist-based evaluation: Applies stage-by-stage criteria (methodology, statistics, ethics, reporting standards) to manuscript assessments.
  • Guided feedback generation: Produces actionable recommendations aligned with established guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA) and best-practice reporting.
  • Workflow and reproducibility: Provides a repeatable peer-review workflow that can be applied across disciplines and manuscript types.

Quick Start

Initiate a structured peer-review of the manuscript using the provided checklist to generate rigorous, standards-compliant feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions about peer-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a structured peer review of a research manuscript?

Yes, you can evaluate manuscripts against established reporting guidelines like CONSORT, STROBE, and PRISMA using a checklist-driven framework that generates actionable recommendations aligned with best-practice reporting standards.

Can I use this structured peer-review workflow for grant reviews?

Checklist-based peer review codifies subjective judgments into repeatable, criteria-driven assessments, helping reviewers produce rigorous, consistent feedback with clear recommendations rather than relying on unstructured opinions.

What guidelines are supported for reporting standards evaluation?

The process provides a repeatable, reproducible workflow with stage-by-stage prompts and guideline references that can be applied across different disciplines and manuscript types for consistent assessments.

Does structured peer review work across different disciplinary contexts?

The workflow breaks down manuscript assessment into stage-by-stage criteria covering methodology, statistics, ethics, and reporting standards, guiding you through each evaluation phase systematically.