Evaluate manuscripts and grant proposals using standardized peer review checklists.
npx skills add https://github.com/mkurman/tamux --skill peer-review-mkurman
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: peer-review Source: https://github.com/mkurman/tamux/tree/main/skills/scientific-skills/peer-review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mkurman/tamux --skill peer-review-mkurman
Peer review is a time-consuming, error-prone process. This skill provides a comprehensive, checklist-driven framework to standardize evaluation of study design, analysis, reporting, reproducibility, and ethics, reducing variability and increasing thoroughness.
Provide a structured review using the skill to guide evaluation of a manuscript.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Checklist-driven peer review applies standardized guidelines like CONSORT and STROBE to evaluate methodology, statistics, and reporting standards stage by stage. This reduces variability and increases thoroughness across manuscripts, grants, and systematic reviews.
Standardizing manuscript evaluation requires enforcing adherence to reporting guidelines and demanding transparent data and code availability. A structured framework delivers actionable major and minor feedback while ensuring ethical and reproducible research practices.
Yes, checklist-based peer review adapts to grant proposals and systematic reviews alongside manuscripts. It evaluates study design, analysis, and ethics across disciplines using reproducible review report workflows and structured feedback templates.
Stage-based manuscript evaluation systematically reviews the Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, and References. It applies discipline-specific checklists like PRISMA and ARRIVE to generate structured critique and actionable feedback.
Yes, evaluating methodology and statistics requires discipline-specific reporting guidelines like CONSORT for trials, STROBE for observational studies, and PRISMA for systematic reviews. These checklists ensure comprehensive and standardized critique.
Checklist-driven peer review focuses on standardized reporting and methodological transparency but may not fully assess scientific novelty or broader contextual impact. It enforces guidelines like MIAME and MINSEQE, requiring explicit data and code availability.
galeepConduct structured peer reviews of scientific manuscripts and research proposals against methodological and statistical standards.
HaykTarkhanyanGenerate hierarchical peer-review reports with major and minor comments.
JosephWoodallGenerate checklist-based peer reviews for manuscripts and grant proposals.
Weiwei-MaoGenerates structured peer-review reports for manuscripts and grant proposals.
