Review academic manuscripts for contribution, methodology, clarity, and ethics.
npx skills add https://github.com/poemswe/co-researcher --skill peer-review-poemswe
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: peer-review Source: https://github.com/poemswe/co-researcher/tree/main/skills/peer-review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/poemswe/co-researcher --skill peer-review-poemswe
This Skill provides a structured and rigorous framework for evaluating academic manuscripts, ensuring they meet high standards of scholarly communication and methodological soundness.
Use the peer-review skill to evaluate the attached manuscript draft.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To perform a rigorous peer review, this Skill evaluates research manuscripts by assessing methodological rigor, presentation clarity, contribution significance, and ethical compliance, then generates structured critique and decision logic for publication readiness.
Structured manuscript critique is the process of evaluating scholarly communication drafts to identify methodological weaknesses and presentation issues. This Skill generates detailed reports with actionable recommendations for authors before journal submission.
You can evaluate research methodology and ethical compliance by submitting a draft paper to this Skill. It performs a comprehensive evaluation of methodological soundness and scholarly standards to determine publication readiness.
Yes, you can use web search, fetching, reading, and grep tools within this Skill to conduct comprehensive manuscript critique. It cross-references scholarly communication standards to ensure accurate research evaluation.
The best way to assess publication readiness is through automated academic peer review. This Skill applies decision logic to evaluate contribution significance and presentation clarity, providing actionable feedback for authors.
Yes, the peer review process supports generating actionable recommendations for authors. It provides structured feedback reports that identify potential weaknesses and suggest improvements for academic writing and research evaluation.
TTAWDTTEvaluate scholarly work across research quality dimensions using the ScholarEval framework.
MoxyWolfLLCEvaluate research papers through a 10-phase academic critique with reviewer prediction.
jadzoghaibGuide manuscript section evaluation with markdown checklists and schematic tools.
Lord1EgyptEvaluate scholarly papers across eight quality dimensions using the ScholarEval framework.
