skills.rest
shanelindsay
shanelindsayCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

peer-review

Evaluate scientific manuscripts with a structured, criteria-driven peer review process.

2|Updated Oct 29, 2025
Search Tags:#methodology#ethics#reproducibility#peer-review#reporting-standards#manuscripts
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/shanelindsay/agentic-r --skill peer-review-shanelindsay
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: peer-review
Source: https://github.com/shanelindsay/agentic-r/tree/main/skills/scientific-thinking/peer-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/shanelindsay/agentic-r --skill peer-review-shanelindsay

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Peer-review is often inconsistent and time-consuming. This Skill provides a systematic toolkit to guide reviewers through a rigorous, criteria-driven evaluation of scientific manuscripts and grant proposals, improving reproducibility and feedback quality.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Searchable checklists and templates covering methods, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, and reporting standards.
  • Stage-based workflow and structured feedback to standardize reviews across disciplines.
  • Use Case: Review a manuscript for methodological rigor, code availability, and clarity of reporting, then generate actionable reviewer comments.

Quick Start

Follow the Stage 1-7 evaluation framework to complete a structured manuscript peer-review using the provided templates.

Frequently Asked Questions about peer-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct a structured peer review of a scientific manuscript?▼

To conduct a structured peer review, use a criteria-driven evaluation framework spanning stages from abstract to references. This process provides searchable checklists for methods and statistics, generating actionable reviewer comments.

What should I check for when evaluating reproducibility and ethics in a manuscript?▼

When evaluating reproducibility and ethics, check for code availability, methodological rigor, and adherence to reporting standards. A systematic peer-review toolkit provides specific checklists to guide these assessments.

Can I use a structured peer-review process for grant proposals and methodological critiques?▼

Yes, you can use a structured peer-review process for grant proposals and methodological critiques. The criteria-driven evaluation framework is applicable across disciplines to assess methodological rigor and clarity.

How do I write actionable reviewer comments from a manuscript evaluation?▼

To write actionable reviewer comments, follow structured feedback guidelines and stage-based workflows. This standardizes reviews across disciplines and translates checklist evaluations into clear, constructive feedback.

Does peer-review evaluation work across different scientific disciplines?▼

Yes, peer-review evaluation works across different scientific disciplines by applying a systematic toolkit. It standardizes assessments for methods, reproducibility, and reporting standards regardless of the specific field.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
ovachieverovachiever
52

peer-review

Automate systematic peer review of scientific manuscripts and grant proposals.

Community
Advanced
stanislavjiricekstanislavjiricek
6

phase-review

Orient Claude as a formal peer reviewer for neuroscience papers.

Community
Intermediate
rubenslivrubensliv
15

peer-review

Evaluate manuscript methodology, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, and reporting against established guidelines.

Community
Advanced
cyberiseeyoucyberiseeyou

pptx

Create and edit PPTX presentations, including raw OOXML and slide XML.

Community
Advanced