phase-review

Name: phase-review
Availability: InStock
Author: stanislavjiricek

Orient Claude as a formal peer reviewer for neuroscience papers.

6|Updated Mar 8, 2026

Search Tags:#neuroscience #academic publishing #scientific writing #journal submission #peer review #referee report

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/stanislavjiricek/neuroflow --skill phase-review-stanislavjiricek

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: phase-review
Source: https://github.com/stanislavjiricek/neuroflow/tree/main/skills/phase-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/stanislavjiricek/neuroflow --skill phase-review-stanislavjiricek

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill streamlines the process of acting as a formal peer reviewer for neuroscience papers, ensuring rigorous and constructive feedback aligned with journal standards.

Core Features & Use Cases

Referee Perspective: Adopts the stance of an external reviewer, not the author.
Journal Calibration: Adjusts review standards based on the target journal's expectations.
Actionable Feedback: Generates specific, prioritized, and constructive criticism.
Use Case: You need to provide a formal referee report for a colleague's manuscript submitted to "Nature Neuroscience". This skill will guide Claude to act as that referee, using the neuroflow:review-neuro methodology.

Quick Start

Use the phase-review skill to orient Claude as a referee for a neuroscience paper.

Frequently Asked Questions about phase-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I generate a formal peer review for a neuroscience paper?▼

To generate a formal peer review for a neuroscience paper, this skill orients Claude as an external referee and delegates to the review-neuro methodology, producing a structured, journal-calibrated referee report.

Can I calibrate my referee report to match specific scientific journal standards?▼

Yes, you can calibrate your referee report to specific scientific journal standards. The skill adjusts its review expectations based on the target journal's guidelines to ensure feedback aligns with academic publishing requirements.

How does Claude act as an external reviewer rather than the author?▼

Claude acts as an external reviewer by adopting a referee perspective through the phase-review skill, ensuring it critiques the manuscript constructively from an outside viewpoint rather than defending the author's writing.

What is the best way to provide actionable feedback on a scientific manuscript?▼

The best way to provide actionable feedback on a scientific manuscript is using the review-neuro methodology, which generates specific, prioritized, and constructive criticism tailored for neuroscience journal submission.

Do I need any specific tools or dependencies to run the peer review process?▼

No specific tools or dependencies are required to run the peer review process. The skill operates independently to guide Claude in generating a referee report, relying solely on the provided manuscript text.

Are there limitations to using AI for peer review in academic publishing?▼

A limitation of using AI for peer review in academic publishing is that the generated referee report acts as guidance rather than a final expert evaluation, requiring human verification of complex neuroscience methodology and references.