review-neuro

Name: review-neuro
Availability: InStock
Author: stanislavjiricek

Analyzes manuscripts across six domains for submission-ready neuroscientific writing.

6|Updated Mar 8, 2026

Search Tags:#neuroscience #scientific writing #journal submission #peer review #research evaluation #manuscript critique

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/stanislavjiricek/neuroflow --skill review-neuro

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-neuro
Source: https://github.com/stanislavjiricek/neuroflow/tree/main/skills/review-neuro
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/stanislavjiricek/neuroflow --skill review-neuro

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a comprehensive, structured peer review for neuroscience manuscripts, identifying potential issues before submission to journals.

Core Features & Use Cases

Six-Area Review: Evaluates language, consistency, claim support, statistics, methods reproducibility, and novelty.
Journal Persona Calibration: Tailors feedback based on the target journal's standards.
Use Case: You've drafted a paper on fMRI connectivity and want to ensure it meets the high standards of Nature Neuroscience. This Skill will act as a pre-submission referee, providing detailed feedback on all aspects of your manuscript.

Quick Start

Use the review-neuro skill to review my paper titled 'Default Mode Network Connectivity'.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-neuro

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I get pre-submission peer review for a neuroscience manuscript?▼

A neuroscience peer review evaluates manuscripts across six core areas: language, internal consistency, claim validity, statistics, methods reproducibility, and contribution novelty. This structured mechanism analyzes manuscript text, figures, tables, and statistical reporting to produce a comprehensive critique before journal submission.

Can I calibrate manuscript critique feedback for a specific neuroscience journal?▼

Yes, manuscript critique feedback can be calibrated for specific neuroscience journals. The review process adjusts its critique based on target journal personas, ensuring that feedback on statistics, methods reproducibility, and novelty meets the exact publication standards required.

Does neuroscience peer review evaluate statistical reporting and methods reproducibility?▼

Neuroscience peer review explicitly evaluates statistical reporting and methods reproducibility. It analyzes manuscript text, figures, and tables to ensure that statistical methods are sound and that experimental procedures can be reliably reproduced by other researchers.

What is the best way to check if my research paper meets high journal submission standards?▼

The best way to check if a research paper meets high journal submission standards is to run a structured pre-submission referee report. This evaluates claim validity, internal consistency, and contribution novelty, calibrating the critique to the target journal's specific expectations.

What should I prepare for a comprehensive neuroscience manuscript critique?▼

For a comprehensive neuroscience manuscript critique, you should prepare your complete manuscript text, figures, tables, and statistical reporting data. The review requires all these elements to accurately evaluate internal consistency, methods reproducibility, and claim validity.