What problem does it solve?
It helps you generate a thorough, referee-style critique of an academic manuscript by systematically checking the argument, identification strategy, econometric specification, literature positioning, writing quality, and presentation.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Referee-style structured review: Produces an overall recommendation with strengths, major/minor concerns, referee objections, and specific comments.
- Causal and econometrics focus: Evaluates identification credibility, key identifying assumptions, standard error choices, estimator appropriateness, and robustness adequacy.
- Citation and positioning checks: Flags potential missing citations and assesses whether the contribution is differentiated from prior work.
Example use case: You submit a working paper draft and want to know which sections are most likely to trigger major referee concerns so you can prioritize revisions before journal submission.
Quick Start
Use the review-paper skill on your manuscript by providing the paper path or filename so it outputs a saved quality report under quality_reports/paper_review_[sanitized_name].md.