skills.rest
trungkiet2005
trungkiet2005COMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

peer-review

Guide manuscript evaluation with structured checklists aligned to reporting standards.

Updated Mar 29, 2026
Search Tags:#ethics#checklists#reproducibility#peer-review#reporting-standards#manuscripts
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/trungkiet2005/ai_code_detection --skill peer-review-trungkiet2005
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: peer-review
Source: https://github.com/trungkiet2005/ai_code_detection/tree/main/.claude/skills/peer-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/trungkiet2005/ai_code_detection --skill peer-review-trungkiet2005

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This structured toolkit guides researchers and editors through a rigorous, standardized peer-review process to improve methodological soundness, reproducibility, and reporting quality across disciplines.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Comprehensive Evaluation: Provides an end-to-end critique covering Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, and References with alignment to established reporting standards (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, ARRIVE, MIAME, MINSEQE).
  • Evidence-Based Feedback: Includes structured checklists, rationale prompts, and line-by-line guidance to produce actionable, reproducible reviewer reports.
  • Adaptable Workflows: Supports manuscript reviews, grant proposals, and cross-disciplinary studies with stage-specific criteria and recommendations.

Quick Start

Read a manuscript and apply the structured peer-review workflow to generate a constructive, publication-ready evaluation.

Frequently Asked Questions about peer-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a structured peer review for a journal submission?▼

Structured peer review evaluates manuscripts by applying standardized checklists aligned to reporting guidelines like CONSORT and PRISMA, covering methodology, statistics, reproducibility, and ethics to produce actionable reviewer reports.

What reporting standards are used for peer review checklists?▼

Peer review checklists align with established reporting standards including CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, ARRIVE, MIAME, and MINSEQE to evaluate methodological soundness and reproducibility across different disciplines.

Can I use a peer review workflow for grant proposals and cross-disciplinary studies?▼

Yes, the peer review workflow adapts to grant proposals and cross-disciplinary studies using stage-specific criteria and standardized checklists to guide rigorous evaluation across different research contexts.

How do I generate a publication-ready reviewer report from a manuscript evaluation?▼

Generate a publication-ready reviewer report by applying line-by-line guidance and rationale prompts across manuscript sections, utilizing structured checklists to ensure comprehensive, reproducible, and constructive feedback.

Does this peer review process check for reproducibility and ethics?▼

Yes, the peer review process explicitly checks for reproducibility and ethics, integrating these criteria into a structured workflow to evaluate reporting quality and methodological transparency.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
haomingzhaomingz
12

paper-review-coach

Perform structured peer-review of academic manuscripts across originality, methodology, results, and writing.

Community
Advanced
CmochanceCmochance

nature-reviewer

Evaluate manuscript drafts against Nature editorial criteria for originality and technical soundness.

Community
Intermediate
hyperbolic-chyperbolic-c
5

peer-review

Evaluate scientific manuscripts and grant proposals with checklist-driven peer review.

Community
Advanced
Yezez9Yezez9

peer-review

Evaluate scientific manuscripts and grant proposals using structured checklists.

Community
Advanced