skills.rest
WanLanglin
WanLanglinCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

peer-review

Evaluate scientific manuscripts using checklist-guided criteria aligned with CONSORT, STROBE, and PRISMA.

Updated Mar 16, 2026
Search Tags:#checklist#review#guidelines#reproducibility#manuscript#peer-review#reporting-standards
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/WanLanglin/spec-driven-vibe-research-skills --skill peer-review-wanlanglin
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: peer-review
Source: https://github.com/WanLanglin/spec-driven-vibe-research-skills/tree/main/skills/review/peer-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/WanLanglin/spec-driven-vibe-research-skills --skill peer-review-wanlanglin

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Systematically evaluate scientific manuscripts using a comprehensive, checklist-guided framework to ensure methodological rigor, transparency, and actionable feedback.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Checklist-guided evaluation: Applies structured criteria to abstracts, methods, results, and discussions, ensuring consistency and fairness across reviews.
  • Multi-stage critique: Provides a stage-by-stage review workflow aligned with common reporting standards (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA) and reproducibility checks.
  • Guidance for authors: Produces constructive, actionable feedback with clear recommendations for revisions and improvements.

Quick Start

Run a structured peer review on a manuscript by applying the Stage 2-4 assessment and guidance on reporting standards.

Frequently Asked Questions about peer-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I do a structured peer review of a scientific manuscript?▼

A structured peer review evaluates a scientific manuscript using a checklist-guided framework to assess methodological rigor, transparency, and ethical considerations across abstract, methods, results, and discussion sections.

How do I check if my manuscript meets CONSORT, STROBE, or PRISMA reporting standards?▼

Reporting standards checks apply CONSORT, STROBE, or PRISMA guidelines to systematically evaluate reproducibility and transparency in your manuscript, ensuring your methods and results meet discipline-specific reporting requirements.

What is the best way to provide constructive feedback on a research manuscript?▼

Constructive feedback for a research manuscript uses a multi-stage critique workflow to produce clear, actionable recommendations for revisions, ensuring fair and methodical guidance for authors.

Can I use checklist-guided evaluation for grant proposals across different disciplines?▼

Checklist-guided evaluation applies to grant proposals and research manuscripts across disciplines, using structured criteria to ensure consistency, methodological rigor, and fair assessment throughout the review process.

What should I look for when reviewing reproducibility and methodology in a manuscript?▼

Reviewing reproducibility and methodology involves using a checklist framework to enforce transparency, proper citation, and ethical considerations within the methods and results sections of a scientific manuscript.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
Weiwei-MaoWeiwei-Mao
2

peer-review

Generates structured peer-review reports for manuscripts and grant proposals.

Community
Advanced
viniruggeriviniruggeri

peer-review

Evaluate scholarly manuscripts and grant reviews for methodological rigor and statistical validity.

Community
Advanced
loganylchenloganylchen

peer-review

Evaluate scientific manuscripts, grant proposals, and presentations against methodology and ethics checklists.

Community
Advanced
sagunkayasthasagunkayastha

peer-review

Evaluate manuscripts and grant proposals using checklist-based peer review criteria.

Community
Advanced