What problem does it solve? It provides a safe, deterministic way to get a Codex CLI second opinion or cross-review on code changes without giving the reviewer any write access to the repository or GitHub, while enforcing author-versus-reviewer independence rules. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Capability-checked read-only execution: Verifies codex exec supports -s read-only, -c, -o, and stdin prompts before launching, and blocks with a structured BLOCKED result instead of falling back to unsafe flags. - Verified target identity: Confirms local HEAD, base ref, and a clean worktree match caller-supplied expected OIDs before reviewing, with shell-literal escaping and --end-of-options to prevent option injection. - Author guard and independence labeling: Accepts only verified Claude-authored cross-review routes or explicit second opinions (labeled non-independent), and fails closed to human adjudication for mixed or unknown authors. - Use Case: A PR workflow routes a verified Claude-authored branch to Codex for cross-review; this skill launches codex exec from a herdr pane, waits on a nonce-marked done file, and returns a verdict with severity-tagged findings. ## Quick Start Ask the agent to run a Codex second-opinion review of the current uncommitted changes and return the verdict and findings.