phase-2-refine

To clarify ambiguous plan requirements, an iterative refinement loop assesses correctness, completeness, consistency, and ambiguity against architecture context. This structured evaluation maps findings to modules and logs decisions until a confidence threshold is reached.

Validating a planning request involves loading architecture context and configuration to evaluate the request iteratively. It checks for correctness, completeness, consistency, duplication, and ambiguity, mapping any findings to specific modules for resolution.

Iterative requirement refinement works by cycling through evaluations of user clarifications and request updates. It logs decisions and continues assessing the plan until the predefined confidence threshold is met or surfaces findings for manual review.

Yes, when the confidence threshold is not reached through user clarifications, the workflow surfaces the accumulated findings for manual review. This ensures unresolved ambiguities or inconsistencies are addressed before proceeding.

You need an iterative clarification loop when your plan requests require validation against architecture context to ensure feasibility. It is essential when subsequent phase outputs must be accurate, actionable, and free of duplication or ambiguity.

Yes, phase-2-refine supports transitioning to phase 3 outline automatically. Once the iterative evaluation reaches the predefined confidence threshold, it seamlessly progresses the workflow to the next phase.