plan-board

Synthesize board plans through Musk, Jobs, and Altman lenses into weighted verdicts.

6|1|Updated Mar 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/anasstissir/lenshub --skill plan-board
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-board
Source: https://github.com/anasstissir/lenshub/tree/main/skills/plan-board
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/anasstissir/lenshub --skill plan-board

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Board-level meta-synthesis that runs three strategic lenses in sequence and surfaces where they agree and where they disagree to produce a clear verdict.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-lens synthesis: executes Musk, Jobs, and Altman perspectives to reveal alignment and conflict.
  • Structured verdicts: outputs GREEN (agreement) and RED/YELLOW tensions to guide decisions.
  • Decision-ready outputs: delivers a final weighted verdict and concrete next steps for leadership.

Quick Start

Run a board-review pass on a new plan by supplying the plan document.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-board

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is multi-lens board review for strategic planning?

Multi-lens board review is a meta-synthesis process that evaluates plans across Musk, Jobs, and Altman perspectives. It identifies agreement signals and disagreement tensions to produce a weighted, decision-ready verdict for leadership.

How do I synthesize strategic plans using multiple decision-making lenses?

You synthesize strategic plans by running board reviews through three distinct lenses in sequence. The process highlights where perspectives agree as signals and disagree as tensions, delivering a final weighted verdict with next steps.

Can I use board review to evaluate plans for leadership decision-making?

Yes, board review is designed for leadership decision-making. It processes plans through multiple strategic lenses to output structured GREEN, RED, and YELLOW verdicts, delivering concrete next steps and decision-ready insights.

What's the best way to identify strategic alignment and conflict in a plan?

The best way to identify alignment and conflict is applying a three-lens meta-synthesis. By executing Musk, Jobs, and Altman perspectives, it surfaces agreement as signal and disagreement as tension, resulting in a clear weighted verdict.

Does plan synthesis require specific frameworks to generate decision-ready insights?

Plan synthesis requires no specific external frameworks. It internally coordinates a three-lens board review across Musk, Jobs, and Altman perspectives to directly output structured verdicts and concrete next steps.

When do I need meta-synthesis for strategic plan evaluation?

You need meta-synthesis when a plan requires board-level clarity. Running multiple strategic lenses reveals hidden alignment and conflict, producing a final weighted verdict necessary for concrete leadership next steps.