plan-ceo-review

Automate structured CEO-level plan reviews with scope expansion and reduction modes.

1|Updated Feb 25, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/alexandervashurin/semaphore --skill plan-ceo-review-alexandervashurin
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-ceo-review
Source: https://github.com/alexandervashurin/semaphore/tree/main/.claude/skills/plan-ceo-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/alexandervashurin/semaphore --skill plan-ceo-review-alexandervashurin

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

CEO-level plan reviews are often ad-hoc and inconsistent. This skill provides a structured, mode-based framework to critique, expand, or condense strategic plans, surfacing gaps and opportunities early.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Four modes of scope management: SCOPE EXPANSION, SELECTIVE EXPANSION, HOLD SCOPE, and SCOPE REDUCTION to shape plans with explicit tradeoffs.
  • Built-in processes like design-doc checks, handoff notes, and the Completeness Principle to ensure thorough, decision-ready outputs.
  • Guided interactions via AskUserQuestion format to surface clear choices, risks, and tradeoffs for leadership decisions.

Quick Start

Invoke /plan-ceo-review to start a rigorous, mode-driven CEO review of your plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-ceo-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct a structured CEO-level review of a strategic plan?

A CEO-level plan review evaluates strategic plans, roadmaps, and business initiatives using a structured, mode-based framework to critique, expand, or condense scope while surfacing gaps and opportunities early.

What is the best way to manage scope tradeoffs during a business initiative review?

Managing scope tradeoffs involves applying explicit modes like scope expansion, selective expansion, hold scope, and scope reduction to shape plans with clear, decision-ready choices for leadership.

How do design docs and office-hours notes factor into a roadmap critique?

Design docs and office-hours notes serve as optional contextual materials that guide discussions and load context during a roadmap critique, ensuring thorough and decision-ready outputs.

Can I use guided prompts to surface risks and choices in a strategic plan review?

Yes, guided AskUserQuestion prompts surface clear choices, risks, and tradeoffs for leadership decisions, automating a structured critique workflow across strategic plans and business initiatives.

Do I need a specific format to start a rigorous plan review?

You need a properly formatted SKILL.md frontmatter with required name and description fields to initiate the review workflow and load the necessary context for leadership discussions.

What are the limitations of ad-hoc plan reviews versus a structured framework?

Ad-hoc plan reviews are often inconsistent, whereas a structured framework applies built-in processes like design-doc checks and handoff notes to enforce the Completeness Principle for thorough outputs.