plan-ceo-review

Evaluate technical plans through multi-mode CEO cognitive pattern review.

Updated Mar 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mihai-chiorean/inc --skill plan-ceo-review-mihai-chiorean
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-ceo-review
Source: https://github.com/mihai-chiorean/inc/tree/main/skills/plan-ceo-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mihai-chiorean/inc --skill plan-ceo-review-mihai-chiorean

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill addresses the lack of critical oversight in development plans, preventing silent failures, architectural landmines, and scope creep by applying rigorous CEO-level cognitive patterns.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-Mode Review: Choose between Scope Expansion, Selective Expansion, Hold Scope, or Scope Reduction to align the review with your specific project goals.
  • Prime Directive Enforcement: Ensures every plan accounts for error handling, observability, edge cases, and data flow integrity.
  • Implementation Alternatives: Forces the generation of multiple approaches (minimal viable vs. ideal architecture) to ensure the best path is chosen before implementation begins.

Quick Start

Invoke the plan-ceo-review skill to perform a rigorous critique of the current strategy document and identify potential failure modes.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-ceo-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit an engineering roadmap for architectural landmines and scope creep?

Audit an engineering roadmap by applying rigorous multi-mode review patterns to technical plans, enforcing failure mode analysis and error mapping to prevent silent failures and architectural scope creep.

What is a CEO-level review for technical project proposals?

A CEO-level review evaluates high-stakes engineering decisions by enforcing data flow integrity, observability, and edge case validation to ensure critical project proposals withstand deep strategic scrutiny.

How do I generate implementation alternatives for architectural plans?

Generate implementation alternatives by forcing multiple approaches during the review process, comparing minimal viable architectures against ideal designs to identify the best path forward before coding begins.

Can I adjust the scope of my strategy review to match specific project goals?

You can adjust strategy review scope using four modes: Scope Expansion, Selective Expansion, Hold Scope, or Scope Reduction, aligning the architectural audit with your specific project requirements.

When do I need failure mode analysis for high-stakes engineering decisions?

You need failure mode analysis when validating high-stakes engineering decisions to enforce strict adherence to error handling, observability, and data flow integrity before approving technical plans.