plan-ceo-review

Review CEO-level plans across four scope modes to surface risks and produce auditable recommendations.

1|1|Updated Mar 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/nuurpro/Converza_ai --skill plan-ceo-review-nuurpro
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-ceo-review
Source: https://github.com/nuurpro/Converza_ai/tree/main/.claude/skills/plan-ceo-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/nuurpro/Converza_ai --skill plan-ceo-review-nuurpro

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps founders and product leaders rapidly reframe and stress-test CEO/founder-mode plans to reveal bigger opportunities, surface risky premises, and align scope with ambitious outcomes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION, SELECTIVE EXPANSION, HOLD SCOPE, SCOPE REDUCTION to adjust ambition and risk.
  • Structured prompts: Guides for challenging assumptions, expanding or narrowing scope, and recording decisions for traceability.
  • Use Case: When asked to think bigger or tighten the plan, it surfaces alternatives and a recommended next step with rationale.

Quick Start

Provide a sharp CEO plan outline for a 2-year roadmap and run it through the four modes to compare outcomes.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-ceo-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I stress-test a CEO strategy plan to surface risky premises?

Stress-test a CEO strategy plan by running it through four modes: scope expansion, selective expansion, hold scope, and scope reduction. This structured review surfaces risky premises, computes tradeoffs, and produces auditable roadmap recommendations.

When do I need to reframe a product roadmap for scope reduction?

You need to reframe a product roadmap for scope reduction when tightening the plan to manage risk. This mode challenges assumptions, narrows scope, and records decisions to align your product strategy with realistic outcomes.

What is the best way to compare scope expansion outcomes for a 2-year roadmap?

The best way to compare scope expansion outcomes is applying structured prompts across four modes to a 2-year roadmap outline. This surfaces alternatives, computes tradeoffs, and delivers a recommended next step with clear rationale.

Can I use this approach to adjust ambition and risk for selective expansion?

Yes, you can adjust ambition and risk for selective expansion by applying structured prompts that guide scope decisions. This mode surfaces alternatives and records decisions for traceability, ensuring your product strategy aligns with ambitious outcomes.

How do I track product scope decisions to ensure traceability?

Track product scope decisions by recording the rationale behind each choice during strategy reviews. This decision-tracking approach surfaces risks, computes tradeoffs, and produces auditable recommendations for roadmap prioritization.

Does this method require specific guiding principles for roadmap prioritization?

Yes, this method requires specific guiding principles to effectively challenge assumptions and compute tradeoffs during roadmap prioritization. These principles ensure the structured prompts produce auditable recommendations across all four scope modes.