plan-design-review

Identify missing design decisions in PLAN documents before implementation.

Updated Mar 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/soyasis/gstack-private --skill plan-design-review-soyasis
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-design-review
Source: https://github.com/soyasis/gstack-private/tree/main/plan-design-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/soyasis/gstack-private --skill plan-design-review-soyasis

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Design reviews are often rushed or under-specified. This Skill provides a rigorous, designer-led critique of a PLAN to surface gaps and ensure explicit, testable decisions before implementation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured review across information architecture, interaction flows, accessibility, and UX consistency.
  • Gap identification with 2-3 concrete improvements and rationale.
  • Guided decision prompts that surface unresolved choices and informed tradeoffs.

Quick Start

Review your PLAN document with me and I will return a prioritized critique and actionable next steps.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-design-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a design plan before implementation to find missing UX decisions?

A design plan review identifies gaps in UI, information architecture, and interaction flows before implementation. It applies structured prompts to surface unresolved choices and ensure testable decisions are explicitly defined.

What is a pre-implementation design critique and when do I need one?

A pre-implementation design critique is a rigorous review of a design plan to catch under-specified decisions. You need it when your plan lacks explicit details for design scope, empty states, responsive behavior, and accessibility.

How do I evaluate information architecture and accessibility gaps in a UI plan?

Evaluating IA and accessibility gaps involves a structured review across interaction flows and UX consistency. This process returns 2-3 concrete improvements with rationale to resolve missing design decisions.

Can I get actionable next steps for fixing design scope and responsive behavior issues?

Yes, reviewing your plan document returns a prioritized critique and actionable next steps. It guides you through informed tradeoffs to mitigate risks and fix responsive behavior and design scope issues.

Does this design review work for interaction flows across multiple devices?

Yes, the design review applies to plan documents that describe interaction flows across devices. It checks responsive behavior and UX consistency to ensure your design decisions are fully specified before development.

What is the best way to ensure my design plan covers empty states and risk mitigation?

The best way is a designer-led critique that uses guided decision prompts to surface missing elements. It ensures your plan satisfies requirements for empty states and risk mitigation through structured recommendations.