Verified:GitHub

plan-design-review

Identify missing design decisions in a PLAN and generate testable recommendations.

Updated Mar 28, 2026

Search Tags:#accessibility #design-system #ui-review #design-critique #empty-states #interaction-patterns #plan-design-review

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/zaeem-rafiq/tatheer-swift-sdk --skill plan-design-review-zaeem-rafiq

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-design-review
Source: https://github.com/zaeem-rafiq/tatheer-swift-sdk/tree/main/.claude/skills/gstack/plan-design-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/zaeem-rafiq/tatheer-swift-sdk --skill plan-design-review-zaeem-rafiq

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Plans often miss critical design decisions or fail to align stakeholders before implementation. This Skill provides a rigorous, facilitator-guided critique to surface gaps, trade-offs, and missing decisions early in the process.

Core Features & Use Cases

Comprehensive multi-pass critique across information architecture, interaction states, journey mapping, AI slop risk, design system alignment, and accessibility.
Actionable recommendations with concrete fixes and prioritization to move a PLAN from good to production-ready.
Collaboration-ready outputs: a completed plan with prioritized TODOs, decisions, and rationale for stakeholders.

Quick Start

Review an existing PLAN by invoking the skill and outputting a prioritized list of gaps and recommended changes in plain language.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-design-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I identify missing design decisions in a plan before implementation?▼

A rigorous design critique surfaces missing design decisions across information architecture, interaction states, journey mapping, and accessibility. It generates concrete recommendations and prioritized next steps to align stakeholders before moving a plan into implementation.

What is the best way to review a UI plan for accessibility and design system alignment?▼

Conducting a multi-pass design critique evaluates UI plans for accessibility, design-system alignment, and responsive behavior. It outputs actionable fixes and prioritized recommendations to move the plan from good to production-ready.

How does a design critique improve empty states and interaction patterns in a plan?▼

A design critique evaluates a plan's landscape to elevate missing decisions regarding empty states and interaction patterns. It explains trade-offs and generates concrete, testable recommendations to guide the team through production-ready next steps.

Can I use a design critique to align stakeholders on journey mapping and responsive behavior?▼

Yes, a facilitator-guided design critique aligns stakeholders on journey mapping and responsive behavior by surfacing gaps and trade-offs early. The collaboration-ready output provides prioritized TODOs, decisions, and rationale to ensure alignment before implementation.

What limitations exist when reviewing a plan for interaction states and AI slop risk?▼

When reviewing a plan for interaction states and AI slop risk, the critique is limited to analyzing the provided plan landscape. It surfaces gaps and missing decisions but relies on the existing plan content to generate concrete recommendations and prioritized fixes.