plan-pipeline-eng-review

Generate Mermaid architecture diagrams, data flow maps, state machines, and test matrices.

Updated May 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/alexica00/claude-code-ultimate-guide --skill plan-pipeline-eng-review-alexica00
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-pipeline-eng-review
Source: https://github.com/alexica00/claude-code-ultimate-guide/tree/main/examples/skills/plan-pipeline/eng-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/alexica00/claude-code-ultimate-guide --skill plan-pipeline-eng-review-alexica00

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Post-direction, pre-implementation command. Takes validated product direction and returns a buildable technical spec with diagrams. Forces the system to think through architecture before a single line of implementation code is written.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Architecture diagram (Mermaid)
  • Data flow diagram
  • State machine for core flow
  • Sync vs async boundary decisions
  • Failure mode inventory
  • Trust boundary map
  • Test matrix
  • Prompt template

Quick Start

Provide a complete engineering architecture plan for a locked product direction using the /plan-pipeline:eng-review workflow, including diagrams, a data flow map, a state machine, and a test matrix.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-pipeline-eng-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate a build-ready architecture plan after locking a product direction?

To generate a build-ready architecture plan, use an engineering review workflow that takes your locked product direction and outputs Mermaid diagrams, a data flow map, a state machine, and a test matrix for implementation planning.

What is included in a pre-implementation engineering architecture spec?

A pre-implementation engineering architecture spec includes architecture diagrams, data flow maps, core flow state machines, sync vs async boundary decisions, a failure mode inventory, a trust boundary assessment, and a test matrix.

How do I map trust boundaries and failure modes before writing implementation code?

Map trust boundaries and failure modes by running a post-direction engineering review that forces architecture planning, producing a trust boundary map and a comprehensive failure mode inventory before coding starts.

Can I use Mermaid diagrams for state machine and data flow mapping in system planning?

Yes, you can use Mermaid diagrams for state machine and data flow mapping during system planning to visually lock the technical direction and define buildable architecture boundaries.

What's the best way to create a test matrix from a validated product direction?

The best way to create a test matrix from a validated product direction is to run an engineering review that processes the locked requirements and outputs a structured test matrix alongside architecture diagrams.

When do I need a state machine and sync vs async boundary assessment for my project?

You need a state machine and sync vs async boundary assessment when your product direction is locked and you must define buildable technical specs, data flows, and failure modes before implementation coding begins.