post-design-review

What problem does it solve?

Game design documents often contain self-consistency errors, unrealistic scope, or unsubstantiated assumptions about existing codebase features, leading to wasted implementation time and costly rework when issues are discovered late in development.

Core Features & Use Cases

• Implementer-Focused Review: Evaluates designs from the perspective of the team that will build the feature, not just creative merits.
• Codebase Alignment Checks: Independently verifies claims about existing systems against the actual codebase to flag "air castle" features that would fail at implementation.
• Iterative Rework Loop: Automatically re-runs reviews after design revisions until the document is solid, or lets users accept known gaps explicitly.
• Use Case: A game dev team can run this skill immediately after drafting a new feature design doc to catch gaps before assigning work to engineers, reducing wasted sprint time.

Quick Start

Use the post-design-review skill to evaluate the game design document at Docs/qq/combat_system_v3.md for implementability and alignment with the current codebase.