Analyze product requirement drafts for claim validity, section completeness, and content consistency.
npx skills add https://github.com/aminianp/skills --skill prd-crit
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: prd-crit Source: https://github.com/aminianp/skills/tree/main/skills/prd-crit Command: npx skills add https://github.com/aminianp/skills --skill prd-crit
This Skill enables systematic review and critique of PRD drafts, sections, or notes, helping teams identify gaps, inconsistencies, and claims requiring evidence for clearer, more reliable product specifications.
Load a product requirements document into your preferred Markdown or text editor and invoke this Skill to analyze its claims, coverage, and coherence, ensuring a complete and validated PRD.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Analyzing a PRD for missing sections involves checking coverage of JTBDs, user journeys, success metrics, and non-goals. This Skill flags missing elements and evaluates relationships between objectives and metrics to ensure comprehensive PRDs.
Claim classification in product requirements identifies and categorizes major claims and assumptions as data-backed, anecdotal, or hypotheses. This mechanism ensures that every assertion within a PRD is evaluated for evidence support before stakeholder review.
Validating PRD claims requires classifying assertions as data-backed, anecdotal, or hypotheses, then verifying evidence support. This Skill analyzes product specs to ensure all claims are supported and key sections are complete prior to stakeholder review.
Yes, you can load a product requirements document into a preferred Markdown or text editor and invoke this Skill to analyze its claims, coverage, and coherence, ensuring a complete and validated PRD without needing external dependencies.
Identifying gaps and vague formatting in PRDs requires structured content feedback on clarity and formatting issues. This Skill provides specific critique directly related to product documentation, highlighting inconsistencies and areas requiring evidence.
safzanpiraniShapes raw markdown notes into structured articles through iterative editing conversations.
nicsuzorReview agent plans and test code for logical errors and untested assumptions.
Maccio-huangGuide users through creating product specifications with structured PRD sections.
AmbroseTriCAnalyzes lecture files for language, formatting, and academic quality issues.
