product-interviewer-revisor

Product context validation detects hallucinations by cross-checking extracted thematic files against the original interview log. It verifies that no invented information was introduced and flags mismatches between the documented context and the source interview data.

Product context validation detects hallucinations by cross-checking extracted thematic files against the original interview log. It verifies that no invented information was introduced and flags mismatches between the documented context and the source interview data.

The best way to ensure context depth and coherence is to run a Devil's Advocate review on the documentation directory. This detects contradictions between files, verifies entity consistency, and ensures the depth supports confident AI decision-making.

Yes, you can generate a structured report with follow-up questions by applying a completeness analysis to the product context directory. The report provides a final verdict and highlights specific gaps requiring further clarification.

Yes, the review process requires the interview-log.md file as a reference baseline. It uses this log to verify coverage and alignment across all thematic files extracted within the documentation directory.