What problem does it solve?
Responding to RFPs, RFIs, tenders, and vendor questionnaires often leads to unsupported claims, lost traceability, and accidental over-commitment. This Skill converts supplied questions and approved source artifacts into a traceable internal-review draft where every claim cites registered evidence and gaps stay visible.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Three-stage workflow: Analyze questions into normalized records, contribute business or product evidence within ownership domains, then draft responses from reviewed claims.
- Evidence traceability: Every claim links to a registered approved source with stable IDs, coverage metrics, and structural readiness checks persisted in a YAML evidence artifact.
- Authority boundaries: Output is always an internal-review draft; the Skill refuses to mark anything approved, submitted, or released, and flags legal or commercial items for human decision.
- Use Case: A sales engineer receives a 50-question security questionnaire. The Skill normalizes each question, maps answers to an approved PRD, drafts qualified responses, and lists unresolved items needing legal review.
Quick Start
Ask the assistant to analyze the attached RFP question set using the approved product requirements document at docs/planning/prd.md and draft an internal-review response.