proposal-review

Reviewing a change proposal before specification involves evaluating problem clarity, user value, option diversity, and decision rationale to prevent weak ideas from advancing. This structured assessment identifies risks and scope boundaries, returning a clear verdict and readiness status.

Pre-spec proposal review in product management is an evaluation process that challenges problem framing, strategic value, and scope boundaries before specification begins. It ensures teams document vision-fit checks and risk identification in a consistent format to guide next steps.

Assessing architecture awareness and rollout realism involves applying a structured evaluation across these specific dimensions within the proposal. This process checks testability and risk honesty, generating blocking questions and suggested edits to ensure readiness.

You can integrate related materials such as AGENTS.md and CONSTITUTION.md files into a proposal assessment when available. The review process automatically incorporates these documents to enforce structured output and ensure decisions align with established guidelines.

A structured proposal evaluation output should include a final verdict, findings by dimension, blocking questions, suggested edits, and a readiness status. This format ensures clear next steps and actionable guidance for advancing to specification.

You need a pre-spec evaluation when you want to prevent weak ideas from advancing to specification and ensure stronger product bets. It is applied before spec to challenge problem framing, option quality, and decision rationale without editing code.