What problem does it solve? Manual QA work produces artifacts that automated test suites never generate: human-readable test plans, structured bug reports for trackers, regression suite definitions, and Figma-vs-implementation checklists. This Skill generates those artifacts from ready-made templates and adds judgment on when a manual finding should become an automated e2e regression test versus a tracked issue. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Template Generation: Produce test plans, step-by-step test cases, regression suites (smoke/targeted/full), and categorized bug reports (standard, UI, performance, security, crash) with severity and priority guidance. - Figma Design Validation: Build design-vs-implementation discrepancy checklists using Figma MCP queries for layout, typography, color, and component states. - Escalation Judgment: Decide whether a manual finding becomes a beads issue or a Playwright e2e spec based on severity, reproducibility, and automation cost, including which CI tag the promoted spec should carry. - Use Case: Before a release, ask for a regression suite for the checkout module, then file a bug report for a payment failure and get a recommendation on whether it warrants an automated @payments e2e test. ## Quick Start Ask the agent to use the qa-test-planner skill to create a test plan for your feature, or run the interactive scripts generate_test_cases.sh and create_bug_report.sh for guided prompts.