What problem does it solve?
Researchers often misidentify independent experimental units, choose tests without a defined estimand, and write statistical Methods, Results, and figure legends that omit sample sizes, effect estimates, or multiplicity corrections, triggering reviewer criticism and desk rejection.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Design-first analysis planning: Defines the estimand, independent experimental unit, replication hierarchy, model choice, multiplicity strategy, and sensitivity analyses before any test is run.
- Reporting audit script: Runs
scripts/reporting_audit.py on Methods, Results, or legend text to detect missing required elements (sample size, test name, effect size, p values, software versions) and risky phrases like "p = 0" or "no difference".
- Reviewer-response support: Parses reviewer statistical comments and produces verification paths plus conservative reply points.
- Use Case: Before submitting a manuscript, paste your Results section and figure legends; the skill audits them for missing n definitions, unnamed tests, and overclaiming language, then rewrites the statistical text in a paste-ready form.
Quick Start
Ask the agent to audit the statistical reporting in your manuscript's Methods and Results sections and rewrite any incomplete or overclaimed statistical statements.